Review



gaussian filtered noise movie  (Stryker)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Stryker gaussian filtered noise movie
    Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional receptive field maps. The receptive field of this simple layer 4 regular-spiking cell was first mapped using a <t>Gaussian-filtered</t> noise stimulus, which generated a detailed two-dimensional map (left). The receptive field was then mapped by presenting individual optimally oriented bright and dark bars in 16 positions covering the same area of visual space, generating the corresponding one-dimensional map (right). The two sets of stimulus responses identified the same set of receptive field subregions, indicating good correspondence between the one- and two-dimensional maps.
    Gaussian Filtered Noise Movie, supplied by Stryker, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gaussian+filtered+noise+movie/pmc02880457-71-11-22?v=Stryker
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gaussian filtered noise movie - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Cellular mechanisms of temporal sensitivity in visual cortex neurons"

    Article Title: Cellular mechanisms of temporal sensitivity in visual cortex neurons

    Journal:

    doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5279-09.2010

    Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional receptive field maps. The receptive field of this simple layer 4 regular-spiking cell was first mapped using a Gaussian-filtered noise stimulus, which generated a detailed two-dimensional map (left). The receptive field was then mapped by presenting individual optimally oriented bright and dark bars in 16 positions covering the same area of visual space, generating the corresponding one-dimensional map (right). The two sets of stimulus responses identified the same set of receptive field subregions, indicating good correspondence between the one- and two-dimensional maps.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional receptive field maps. The receptive field of this simple layer 4 regular-spiking cell was first mapped using a Gaussian-filtered noise stimulus, which generated a detailed two-dimensional map (left). The receptive field was then mapped by presenting individual optimally oriented bright and dark bars in 16 positions covering the same area of visual space, generating the corresponding one-dimensional map (right). The two sets of stimulus responses identified the same set of receptive field subregions, indicating good correspondence between the one- and two-dimensional maps.

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Generated



    Similar Products

    gaussian filtered noise movie  (Stryker)
    90
    Stryker gaussian filtered noise movie
    Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional receptive field maps. The receptive field of this simple layer 4 regular-spiking cell was first mapped using a <t>Gaussian-filtered</t> noise stimulus, which generated a detailed two-dimensional map (left). The receptive field was then mapped by presenting individual optimally oriented bright and dark bars in 16 positions covering the same area of visual space, generating the corresponding one-dimensional map (right). The two sets of stimulus responses identified the same set of receptive field subregions, indicating good correspondence between the one- and two-dimensional maps.
    Gaussian Filtered Noise Movie, supplied by Stryker, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gaussian+filtered+noise+movie/pmc02880457-71-11-22?v=Stryker
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gaussian filtered noise movie - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional receptive field maps. The receptive field of this simple layer 4 regular-spiking cell was first mapped using a Gaussian-filtered noise stimulus, which generated a detailed two-dimensional map (left). The receptive field was then mapped by presenting individual optimally oriented bright and dark bars in 16 positions covering the same area of visual space, generating the corresponding one-dimensional map (right). The two sets of stimulus responses identified the same set of receptive field subregions, indicating good correspondence between the one- and two-dimensional maps.

    Journal:

    Article Title: Cellular mechanisms of temporal sensitivity in visual cortex neurons

    doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5279-09.2010

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of one-dimensional and two-dimensional receptive field maps. The receptive field of this simple layer 4 regular-spiking cell was first mapped using a Gaussian-filtered noise stimulus, which generated a detailed two-dimensional map (left). The receptive field was then mapped by presenting individual optimally oriented bright and dark bars in 16 positions covering the same area of visual space, generating the corresponding one-dimensional map (right). The two sets of stimulus responses identified the same set of receptive field subregions, indicating good correspondence between the one- and two-dimensional maps.

    Article Snippet: We then mapped the receptive field of the cell with a Gaussian filtered noise movie (SD of filter 0.82 pixels;( Niell and Stryker, 2008 ).

    Techniques: Comparison, Generated